Diamondback Response Sport review


Diamondback response sport: The Response Sport was introduced to the UK shortly after the whole range was launched. There is a US version with different finishing kit. You won’t find many £500 bikes with 27 Shimano Deore gears, Shimano disc brakes and a RockShox fork. While the Dart 2 is basic compared to more costly RockShox forks, its controlled rebound sets it apart from the more clunky rebounds of many rival forks on £500 bikes. 

The nine-speed rear gears and hydraulic disc brakes mean it’s more future proof than some of its price rivals. Add that to confident handling on all types of terrain and you have a bike that we’d recommend to anyone with trail ambition. Beefy tyres, strong wheels and a wide handlebar add to the appeal, but also make it harder work than some other bikes if you spend a lot of your time on blacktop.

Ride & handling: Behaves itself on the all-condition trails that often challenge budget bikes

We had to adjust the front mech way higher than its recommended clamp spot to get clean gear shifts, and the rear gear mech knocks on the underside of the chainstay when descending on bumpy terrain in the big chainring. Apart from that, the Sport is a fun bike to ride on any terrain type. We have seen better cranksets on £500 bikes, but Shimano brakes and gears are efficient once you’ve got them set up and the finishing kit is decent quality.

You’ll notice the drag of the big grippy treads and hefty 36-spoked wheels on the uphills and in acceleration but they add to confidence on rough descents, as does the relaxed frame geometry, wide handlebar and well controlled fork rebound. The Diamondback’s hard hitting trail credentials set it apart from a lot of other £500 bikes we’ve tested.
While the back end of the frame is fairly harsh over rough terrain when you stay sitting, the padded saddle and big treads take the edge off bumps and the soft rebound of the fork gives the confidence to hover over the bike using bent knees and elbows to maintain a steady rhythm as you nip and dip across twists and bumps. Steering is reassuringly neutral, in that you’re hardly aware of it, across high and low-speed terrain.

Frame & equipment: RockShox Dart 2 fork boosts ride confidence

Diamondback bikes are distributed by Raleigh in the UK, and the ‘made for the UK market’ aspect shows itself in under-down tube Crud Catcher bosses, generous mud clearances and tyres that work well in poor trail conditions. A wide riser bar, big profile grippy tyres, soft saddle and relaxed frame geometry all add the sort of comfort that will boost the ride confidence of someone who’s a relative beginner to rough trail riding.
A lot of bikes at this price make compromises to off-road ability in order to double up as utilitarian workhorses. The Response Sport’s concession is luggage rack bosses. The frame is straightforward in construction, with neutral geometry and hydroforming in the main tubes to boost stiffness and crash resistance without adding excessive weight. All-in weight is 31lb without pedals so it’s no lightweight.

Ride comfort is left principally to soft saddle padding, the tyres and the fork. The RockShox Dart 2 theoretically offers 100mm of compression but it’s hard to get more than about 70mm even on the biggest hits. It’s not really a fork designed for aggressive riding and the lockout is basic and clunky but we prefer the rebound control to most other forks on bikes at this price, because it’s controlled rather than simply bouncing back like a loaded spring.
If you can find a bike with 27 gears at this price, go for it. You might not feel a lot of difference on the trail but you’ll be getting a bike with a better quality set of gears that should serve you well for a little longer. Look for downgrades elsewhere though, here the crankset was the obvious one. The 2.25in CST Caballero treads are a drag on Tarmac but add to poor condition trail traction confidence, as well as comfort, something many £500 MTBs lack because of heavier duty frames and basic contact points.

A wide, in this case 27in, handlebar can have a big impact on the way you’ll feel about the handling of a bike when you’re powering through twisty, bumpy singletrack. You can also tweak the back-sweep of a bar like this to give you the precise hold feel you prefer.


This article was originally published in What Mountain Bike magazine.

GT Zaskar Comp reviews

The GT Zaskar is one of mountain biking’s longest-running hardtail success stories. Cropping up in various incarnations over the years, it’s been ridden by pros covering the gamut from trials to cross-country racing. This isn’t a bike that’s going to set pulses racing. It’s neither light enough to win races nor nimble enough for extended sessions of rock-dodging. What it is, though, is a thoroughly sorted all-rounder that’ll do most things well.

Ride & handling: Efficient ride position makes mile munching easy

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. It may be a well-worn cliché, but GT’s designers haven’t tried to redefine the trail hardtail with the Zaskar Comp, much less reinvent the wheel. The geometry is based on a tried-and-tested, cross-country friendly set of numbers that deviates only slightly from the NORBA norm of the 90s – and it’s all the better for it. Riders used to shorter cockpits may initially feel a bit stretched out, but the GT’s a comfy place to be for long periods of pedalling. 

Perfect front-to-rear weight distribution makes getting the power down easy, while a frame that won’t sacrifice your fillings on the altar of pedalling efficiency works in tandem with the supple fork to keep the wheels stuck firmly to the ground. A shorter stem would make it easier to haul the front wheel from line to line in fast-changing situations, but there’s something to be said for the stability of the stock set-up.

Frame: Tried and tested formula

The remarkable thing about 2011’s Zaskar is that it would be immediately recognisable to a mountain biker from 20 years ago as a GT. There have been some geometry tweaks and tubing profile changes, but the distinctive GT ‘triple-triangle design’ – more of a design flourish than a functional benefit, despite the company’s early 90’s claims – makes it stand out from the crowd, even today. 

In keeping with the trend to mould every tube in sight into a shape that’s anything but round in profile, the Zaskar Comp’s top and down tubes get the full hydroforming treatment. The cross-sections are gratifyingly narrow by current standards, though, hinting at an emphasis on comfort over outright rigidity. And, despite the high-tech tubing wizardry, there’s still a neat box-section reinforcing gusset up front.

Equipment: GT finishing kit looks a tad cheap

Unlike some of the competition, the Zaskar doesn’t get the 10-speed treatment. To be honest, the only time you’re likely to miss the extra sprocket is when winching yourself up the steepest of climbs. And the payback is that the cheaper transmission has left room in the budget for an air fork, in the form of a RockShox Recon. It’s head and shoulders above the coil alternative and well worth a bit of extra grunt on the climbs. 

Finishing kit is mostly own-brand stuff, which works fine but lacks the kudos or finish of some of the brand-name competition. Oh, and  the undeniably bright yellow and blue accents are only slightly marred by the fact that none of the anodised components match the blue of the graphics, saddle or grips.

Article Source:www.bikeradar.com

Spin Spitfire MKIII titanium race bike

Up against carbon fibre, aluminium and even steel, titanium road frames are currently lagging behind a little in the popularity stakes. This doesn’t reflect its suitability as a frame material or its ride quality, but rather its affordability. However, Spin, a relatively new name in the titanium bike world, say they wouldn’t make their frames from anything else.
We posted a review of their Spitfire MkII sportive bike just this week, and hot on its heels is the more race-orientated Spitfire MkIII Supermarine. With claims of being both stiffer and lighter than its little brother, Spin say the MkIII has been tuned with the sole purpose of speed in mind. 

The frame, which has a hand-brushed finish, has a lifetime warranty – an indicator of titanium's durability. As with the MkII, it’s sold as a frame module (with fork, headset, seatpost, stem and handlebar), for £2,350. Spin also offer full builds using mainly own-brand kit; the bike shown here checks out at £4,150.

Spin reckon it’s a shame to buy a titanium frame only to deck it out in carbon and aluminium components. They insist they're fans of both materials, but only where it’s strictly necessary. Reflecting this, the MkIII comes with a titanium seatpost and stem but a carbon fork and bar
Spin spitfire mkiii: spin spitfire mkiii
Titanium finds its way into many of the MkIII's components, including this oversized stem

With a propensity for giving their components over-the-top names, the oversized down and seat tubes (Super Massive Black Hole and Fatty Arbuckle) and fork (Fork In Hell) don't disappoint. So how does it ride? Procycling magazine's operations editor and titanium newbie Jamie Wilkins took it for a spin and gave us his initial thoughts:

"From the first pedal stroke the Spitfire MkIII Supermarine feels unique and not just because of the non-round Rotor Q-Rings. Fans of titanium love to wax lyrical about its ride character and within a few miles you can start to appreciate what they’re talking about. The MkIII is really comfortable but not in the same way as a carbon fibre bike. It’s smooth and effective against all size bumps, from poor tarmac to big potholes, but where a top carbon fibre frame isolates you from the road with a dampened feel the Spitfire MkIII talks to you a lot more.
"You can actually feel the frame and post compress and rebound like a spring. This is the ‘zingy’ quality that gets talked about so much. It’s definitely a matter of taste because it feels rather bouncy after a carbon fibre race bike – a fair comparison because this is Spin’s race frame. The Fizik Arione saddle and carbon fibre handlebar add extra comfort too, the latter trading off some stiffness for vibration-damping and getting a good return on the deal.

"As this is presented as a race frame, pedalling stiffness is essential and this is where we started to miss our usual carbon fibre ride. When you’re out of the saddle, pulling on the bars and stomping on the pedals there’s some tangible sway in the bottom bracket and some wag in the rear triangle – no more than many comfort-orientated carbon fibre frames but enough that we wouldn’t choose to race on it. This is no sprinter’s frame. Of course, at less than extreme levels of effort you’ll never notice.
Spin spitfire mkiii: spin spitfire mkiii
Jamie thinks too much bottom bracket sway would force him to leave the MkIII at home come race day

"A bike like this will always be limited to niche appeal. So what’s the niche for the Spin Spitfire MkIII Supermarine? We’d say that it’s well suited to those looking to ride long sportives with some vigour, who are fans of titanium, and who like bikes with really long names!"

Full specification
  • Frame: Spin Spitfire Mk III Supermarine, titanium
  • Fork: Spin Fork In Hell, 380g, full-carbon
  • Headset: Spin Hendrix, titanium, with Purple Haze or King Mirror Polished finish 
  • Seatpost: Spin Monolithic T-Zero, titanium main tube, clamp housing, bosses and bolts 
  • Seat Clamp: Spin QuickLight, titanium, in King Mirror Polished or Hendrix Purple Haze finish
  • Stem: Spin Monolithic Bi-Axial, titanium, 31.8mm, available in 100, 110, 120 and 130mm lengths and +/- 10 degrees rise 
  • Handlebar: Spin QuickLight Compact Ergonomic, carbon fibre, 31.8mm, with dual integral cable routing channels
  • Wheels: Spin Speed Metal (gun metal finish hubs, Quicksilver 30mm polished aluminium rims, DT Swiss Aerospeed spokes)
  • Crankset: Rotor Agilis cranks and Q-Rings
  • Groupset: SRAM Red (SRAM Force front derailleur)
  • Saddle: Fizik Arione

Article Source: www.bikeradar.com

Cannondale CAAD 10 Dura-Ace Compact review

With so much invested into manipulating aluminium tubes, manufacturers are compelled to keep pushing the envelope just that little bit further with every model year, as evidenced by the latest Cannondale CAAD 10. Its 6069 aluminium frame is smoothly welded and beautifully put together, with every inch of tubing subjected to some sort of manipulation process.

Besides the massively supersized head tube to down tube interface, the CAAD 9’s curved seatstays have been straightened and made beefier; shot into either side of the seat tube with an unusually wide stance, they produce a stouter ride than previously… maybe a little more than desired, actually, despite the shock absorption claims of Cannondale’s SAVE design concept. But nothing a wise choice of wheel, seatpost and saddle can’t help. 

Our high-spec test bike with Shimano Dura-Ace costs £2,499, but the Ultegra-equipped CAAD 10 comes in at £1,899, with the same frame, and Mavic Aksium wheels instead of the Shimano RS80 hoops here. Otherwise it’s much the same, with a Fizik Arione saddle on a carbon seatpost, and an FSA SL-K Light carbon crank feeding power through a stout BB30 bottom bracket. 

We flung the CAAD 10 headfirst into the first aggressive big group ride we could and, suffice to say, when you’ve got to reel in riders and force your way through to the front of the peloton, this is the bike to do it on. The Cannondale has excellent handling, with ‘sweet spot’ geometry for quick and nimble fun. Flicking through switchbacks, out-of-saddle efforts, or changing line midway through a bend were all made easy, with the bike working with you rather than against: like the best of dance partners. 

Underneath the Shimano superkit, the CAAD 10 is up there with the best aluminium frames you can get, ready to hit the races, club rides, sportives, or whatever you can throw it at. While current market trends might lead certain camps to begin writing off metals as a future frame material, don’t do so just yet. Aluminium, we’re convinced, has still got legs.

Cannondale Trail SL1 review

Despite the name, Cannondale describes the Trail SL as “a racer through and through”. The SL1 is the most expensive of the Trail SL series – Cannondale does 29er versions of the bike, but we’re looking at the 26er. 

There’s a lot to like about the Trail SL1 – it looks great, the frame is well designed and finished, and it’s got lively handling. The parts spec is only adequate, though.

Ride & handling: A lively feeling bike with agile handling

Cannondale’s not kidding with the racer thing – the SL1 is long, low and lively. It’s not all that light (12.5kg), which dulls acceleration a bit, but its race-day DNA shines through. In some senses it’s a demanding bike, but it’s also a rewarding one – it compels you to pedal hard all the time, and requires your full attention as speeds rise, but it reacts to power and steering inputs with alacrity, allowing for the extra bit of weight it feels like it’s carrying.
The Cannondale is agile, and feels close to an old-school cross-country (XC) bike. And that SAVE (Synapse Active Vibration Elimination) back end? Without riding a bike that’s exactly the same apart from the stays, it’s impossible to say how effective it is, but the Trail SL1 isn’t a harsh bike despite the relatively low-volume tyres. The flattened stays don’t do it any harm. 

Frame: Well designed and finished

The SL1 shares its frame with the rest of the Trail SL series. Despite that range starting at just £500, the chassis has an impressively high-end look and feel. Cannondale has used generally straight pipes in the front end, with just a little bit of a curve at the front of the down tube and a flared top tube.

Out back things get considerably more interesting thanks to Cannondale’s SAVE chain and seatstays with flattened mid-sections. SAVE is described as micro-suspension, which roughly translates as flexes a tiny bit. Flattened stays at the back end are claimed to yield a bit of comfort-enhancing give. While it's hard to filter out any effect from seat post flex and tyre cushioning, the Trail's a pretty comfy bike.

There’s reasonable clearance around the 2.1in Schwalbe tyres fitted, but you wouldn’t want to go much bigger than that. And, if you’re tall, take a good look at Cannondale – many bikes don’t even come in XL, but the SL1 can be had not just in XL but also a super-sized Jumbo variant.

Equipment: Merely okay in the value for money stakes

Cannondale has always tended to deliver a high-end frame at a given price point, usually compromising on components to do so. That’s not a bad approach, given that components wear out, but it does leave the SL1 looking merely okay in the value for money stakes. Up front is a RockShox Recon fork, which Cannondale has specced with a full 1.5in steerer to take full advantage of the frame’s oversized head tube. 

While none of the Trail SL range comes with Cannondale’s Lefty fork, the frame’s 1.5in head tube is ready to accommodate one should you want to upgrade. With a suitable headset it’ll also take a tapered steerer, or use a straight 1.125in steerer and play with Anglesets.
No complaints about the all-Shimano transmission set-up, which is smooth and reliable. We’re not massively enamoured of the Hayes Stroker Ryde brakes, which are a little over-firm in feel, if adequate in power. Finishing kit is Cannondale’s own, and none the worse for that.

Article Source: bikeradar.com

Intense M9 FRO – First ride review

Based Intense Cycles have been busy once again producing their latest pedigree downhill bike, the M9 FRO. With help from some of the fastest riders in the world – Intense claim that their M-series, of which this is the latest incarnation, has been ridden by more pro athletes than any other downhill bike ever – the M9 FRO should be one of the best bikes out there. It's a real racer's bike, with masses of adjustment and speed. But the suspension feel won't suit everyone.

Ride & handling: Plenty of speed but a harsh rear end

An uplift day back in the UK helped with bike setup before we headed to Europe’s downhill capital, Morzine in France, to really give it some. Unfortunately, the day on the bike in the UK raised some setup issues. The Cane Creek Double Barrel shock’s compression damping, even when turned to minimum, created a harsh feeling after about 70 per cent of the travel.
This was especially true when hitting high-speed compressions hard – and this was with the bike set to its most linear suspension ratio curve. It wasn’t enough to blow your feet off the pedals but it was enough to really put some force up through them. In the end we settled on using a softer spring and still using minimal damping. We did try the M9 with a stock Fox shock for a short amount of time, which helped with reducing how harsh the rear end felt.
We ended up running the bike in its longest wheelbase and slackest head angle options while out in the Alps. In those settings, the 1,205mm (47.4in) wheelbase is super-stable, but not so long that corners become a chore. We also found that in the two shorter chainstays settings the rear wheel would buzz the saddle, which wasn’t ideal. 

Out in the rough stuff, we got used to the M9’s harsh feel, but it did mean we were getting pretty beaten up on the long alpine descents. What really does stand out is the speed at which the M9 picks up, and if you can deal with the slightly harsh ride, you can definitely be rewarded with some serious speed potential.

Frame & equipment: Neat chassis adjustments and durable, high-end build

The M9 FRO is one the most adjustable downhill bikes on the market. It has three travel options, adjustable shock progression, three chainstay length adjustments and a Cane Creek AngleSet that offers head angles from 62.5 to 65.5 degrees. The frame is constructed from 6061 T6 aluminium and as well as the neat adjustment features, it also has a bolt-in top headset cup which allows for easy removal and angle changes. 

Our test bike had a durable but high-end build, with a RockShox Boxxer Team fork and Cane Creek Double Barrel shock taking care of the suspension, while Truvativ’s Holzfeller OCT cranks, MRP G2 chainguide and SRAM X9 made up the running gear. Formula’s powerful The One brakes take up the job of slowing the M9 down, the wheelset is Easton Havoc and the finishing kit all is all supplied by Easton.

Boardman AiR/TT 9.8 - First Ride Review

It's rare that you can jump on a time trial bike and immediately feel at home on it. In our experience it usually takes weeks to months to fine tune a position. That's why the Boardman AiR/TT 9.8 surprised us - in a good way. On its maiden journey we were able to get comfy almost straight away, which meant we could concentrate on extracting some decent speed out of it. 

Ride and Handling

The AiR/TT likes going fast. This was apparent after we'd done 2 miles on it and knew what sort of speed the ride would be. Although it was a low level endurance ride, effort wise, the speed told a different story. We were happy to finish with an average speed of over 22mph and couldn't resist winding it up to 45mph a few times on descents. This was without pushing particularly hard during the ride, evidenced by the Garmin trace here. 

Admittedly the Boardman's Zipp Sub 9 disc and 404 front wheel fitted with Vittoria Corsa Evo CX tubulars gave us some extra speed compared to standard training wheels. This is a race ready bike after all. Still, you can't beat the buzz of doing a quick training ride and that's made us keen to do some more testing on it. 

We were more than happy with its cornering performance. As a rule, TT bikes don't tend to corner that well but the Boardman's road-like geometry gave us confidence to take smooth lines around bends at speed, on or off the extensions. When on the cowhorns, the Vision Trimax carbon bars give a good, safe position.
Vision trimax carbon base bar and extensions offer plenty of adjustability too: vision trimax carbon base bar and extensions offer plenty of adjustability too
Speaking of bars, there's plenty of adjustment in the cockpit too. The elbow pads have three different width settings, the extensions can be shortened or lengthened and even moved outwards if desired, and as a standard stem and steerer are used, it's easy to adjust bar angle and height. This is all quite important in setting up your position, as Boardman himself explained in Aerodynamics made easy. 

Braking is something we avoid as much as possible and it's generally of secondary importance on a TT bike, especially one with integrated brakes like the AiR/TT. We were therefore prepared for a bit of sponginess in this department - but didn't get any from the cantilevered TRP callipers. Chalk one up for the 'nice to haves'. 

We did however experience a small amount of wheel rub on the non-driveside brake pad when out of the saddle. The cause of this turned out to be the frame alignment being out by a couple of millimetres in our sample model (Andy Smallwood from Boardman Bikes assures us that this isn't a problem with the production models). This produced rub when combined with the wide rim of the Zipp Sub 9 disc, a bit of wheel flex and non-adjustable 45 degree dropouts. We were subsequently able to sort it by backing the brakes off as far as we dared - not the ideal solution but it worked.

Frame and equipment
The trp front brake is integrated into the fork to hide it from the wind. but it's also accessible for easy adjustment: the trp front brake is integrated into the fork to hide it from the wind. but it's also accessible for easy adjustment
The AiR/TT 9.8 sits at the top of Boardman's four-bike time trial range although the frames are almost identical among all four. They're largely based on the original Elite AiR/TT/1 with the most obvious change being moving the brakes inside the front fork and underneath the bottom bracket. The fork is a lot deeper than the original, while the box shaped chainstays are also upsized for extra stiffness. 

The 9.8 is kitted out with SRAM Red to keep it light, Zipp R2C (return to centre) shifters, integrated TRP brakes, Vision Trimax carbon base bars and extensions, a Zipp 404 (or 1080 if you prefer) front wheel, Zipp Sub 9 disc, and a Fizik Arione Carbon Tri 2 saddle.
Gearing is a little different to what we're used to, although it does make sense: a 54/42t chainset coupled with an 10spd 11-25t rear cassette. The 54 tooth big ring gives you that little bit extra for fast downhill stretches, and we used it to good effect.

All in all it's a light machine by TT standards, with our 56cm model coming in on our scales at 7.85kg / 17.05lb without pedals.

Volagi Liscio review

At their most basic level, road bikes only have to perform a very limited set of tasks: accelerate, roll along, turn and stop. Most companies focus primarily on the first three attributes and the metrics that affect them (stiffness, weight, geometry, ride quality) but upstart outfit Volagi have pushed the boundaries a bit further by including disc brakes on their Liscio endurance machine.  

Are they necessary? Hardly. But after spending a few months on them, it's hard to go back to the status quo. That Volagi have managed to integrate them into a satisfying all-day road cruiser that's perfectly suited to how most roadies actually ride is all the more impressive. In all likelihood, you're only going to see more of this sort of rig in the years ahead.

Ride & handling: Solid marks on the frameset but it's all about the brakes

We don't normally concentrate on one particular component in a complete bike review but in the case of the Volagi Liscio, it's impossible not to focus on the one major difference it has over its rivals. Simply put, the Avid BB7 road brakes are flat-out brilliant as compared to conventional rim brakes – but not in the sense of absolute power, as most people assume.
No, the main advantage is modulation of that power. Once we got used to the bike's heightened capabilities, we approached tricky downhill corners faster than with just about any other road brake we've used, confident with the knowledge that we could reliably scrub a precise amount of speed with fingertip control. Ultimate stopping power is largely a function of a tire's grip on the road but with the Liscio's discs, it's far easier to extract all of that power without fear of crossing the threshold into dangerous lock-up.

In fact, locking up even the rear wheel proved surprisingly difficult to do. Stopping power builds in such a linear and predictable fashion that you have to violently slam the rear lever all the way to the bar while simultaneously shifting your weight forward to initiate a skid – and yet stopping distances from any speed are still surprisingly short and repeatable.
Riders living in mountainous regions will also find solace in the Liscio brakes' greater heat capacity than rim brakes. Whereas extended brake application and the resultant heat build-up in clincher or tubular rims can produce a dangerous blowout or rolled tire, you can drag the BB7 to your heart's content with little consequence.  

One of our test rides included dragging just the rear brake down a 1.6km-long (one mile) descent with a steady -5% gradient so as to maintain a constant 40km/h (25mph) speed under a 70kg (155lb) rider. Not only was there no fade from start to finish but we were still able to make an abrupt panic-like stop at the end of the run with just a hot rear rotor (that quickly cooled) and some tangible pad wear to show for it.

Thankfully for Volagi, the Liscio isn't only about slowing down; it's proven to be a satisfying all-day cruiser, too. The carbon frame is reasonably lightweight at 1,170g (53cm size) and the relatively long head tube puts the rider in a comfortable, "eyes-up" position well suited for gobbling up miles. Overall frame and drivetrain stiffness is about average for a mid-range carbon bike. Naturally, the Liscio is heavier than an equivalent rim brake-equipped machine so buyers shouldn't expect lightning-quick reflexes for their local weekend crit – but that's not really the Liscio's intended market.

What Volagi do promise is an ultra-smooth ride courtesy of the Liscio's novel LongBow seatstays, whose flattened shape arcs past the seat tube and joins directly to the top tube for more rear-end flex. Unfortunately, we didn't quite find it to deliver. Ride quality is very good but not the picture of creamy goodness we expected and the seemingly thick tube walls don't lend themselves to a particularly lively feel. It's far from uncomfortable but not that far off from average, either.

Handling is about what you'd expect from a bike with the relatively slack angles, tall front end and long wheelbase typical for this category. Straight-line stability is outstanding – even more so as speeds increase – and the Liscio happily motors along without needing constant attention like more nervous crit bikes. Turn-in requires a touch more conviction but once you've got it laid over, the Liscio carves corners with aplomb, aided by the stock 25mm-wide tires mounted on wide-profile rims. 
The rear disc caliper is neatly tucked inside the rear triangle for a cleaner look and volagi wisely downsizes to a 140mm rotor: the rear disc caliper is neatly tucked inside the rear triangle for a cleaner look and volagi wisely downsizes to a 140mm rotor
The rear Avid BB7 disc caliper is neatly tucked inside the rear triangle for a cleaner look 
and Volagi wisely downsize to a 140mm rotor

Frame: Curvaceous lines and a clean look

Volagi's website lists two different Liscio frames, with our entry-level Rival model using 24-ton carbon fiber and the other using a stiffer 24/30-ton blend, but feel free to ignore that. Our sample bore a "24/30t" decal on the seat tube and according to company co-founder Robert Choi, all of the Liscio frames are now identical.

Disc brakes and the previously mentioned LongBow seatstays aside, the VolagiLiscio frame is fairly standard stuff, with its modular monocoque carbon fiber construction, tapered 1-1/8 to 1-3/8in head tube, carbon dropouts, and true BB30 bonded-in aluminum bottom bracket sleeve. Actual weight for our 53cm sample is 1,170g (with seatpost collar, rear derailleur hanger and water bottle bolts) plus another 430g for the matching all-carbon fork. 
Volagi make mention of the frame's nominally aero tube shapes but while there might be some measurable benefit to the teardrop-profile down tube, seat tube and seatpost, as usual it isn't detectable from the saddle. Aero might be all the buzz right now but given the bike's intended user, we feel the frame would be better served by more conventional and thinner-walled pipes that might lend a more refined ride quality instead.

Volagi have done a good job of incorporating a lot of versatility, however, with full fender mounts plus removable hardware in case you want to run conventional rim brakes. The disc configuration yields a clean appearance, with internally routed brake lines that are also fully guided for easy servicing. We don't completely agree with where Volagi have chosen to put the entry and exit points – housing length is critical and you first have to disconnect the lines to get a proper caliper setup – but the idea is nice.
Much as we love the idea of disc brakes on the road, what's yet to be determined long-term is the rear hub spacing. Volagi have decided to stick with the standard 130mm dimension but insider rumblings suggest the industry will ultimately settle on the current 135mm disc hub standard instead. Whether or not this poses an issue for early adopters remains to be seen but it's definitely something to keep in mind.

Equipment: High-value Rival group plus intriguing Ignite wide-profile clinchers

Volagi offer the Liscio with higher-end Shimano Ultegra and Dura-Ace mechanical groups but the entry-level SRAM Rival version looks to provide the best value at US$2,895. Rival provides impressively close shifting performance to the top-end Red group but with just a touch more weight and slightly longer lever throws – neither of which should bother most casual riders.

Standard builds include a wide-range SRAM cassette, KMC chain and FSA Gossamer BB30 crank, but our tester came with an Ultegra cassette and SL-K BB30 crankset – the latter of which is available as an upgrade for US$300. Riders concerned about weight can drop around 150g that way but the Gossamer is a perfectly functional unit. Total weight for our slightly upgraded test sample was 7.84kg (17.28lb) without pedals.

FSA also provide the standard build's OS-150 stem (ours came with an OS-99 but there are no major functional differences aside from weight) and comfy Wing Pro bar, whose short reach and compact bend were well suited to the Liscio's intended use. The standout line item for us, however, was the E7 Ignite XL wheels, which aren't light at 1,840g per pair but like the frame, are similarly progressive in design with a very wide – but shallow – rim profile that emphasizes ride quality.  

Aero it's not, but the broader foundation blends perfectly with the stock 25mm tires to provide confident traction in corners plus a less jarring ride than more typical 23s. There's noticeable lateral flex in hard corners that we expected given the narrow flange spacing but it wasn't nearly as bad as we'd expected – perhaps tempered by the wide rim's extra stiffness. Our wheels did go slightly out of true during testing, though.

Overall: Great choice for mountainous or wet regions

Skeptics will undoubtedly point out that disc brakes add weight to road bikes and at least for now, that's true – but not to the vast degree that some are claiming. Regardless, riders living in hillier or consistently wetter areas will still benefit from the Liscio's far more controllable, consistent and safer stoppers and the bike overall is good enough that the brakes aren't just a standalone gimmick. We've heard the arguments before – remember V-brakes? – but read our lips: this is just the beginning.
Volagi say the extended
Volagi say the extended Long Bow seatstays lend more vertical flex than conventional designs for a more comfortable ride. Sounds good in theory and the overall ride quality is indeed pretty smooth 
but it wasn't quite the buttery glide we were expecting